Pure Air Solutions Services - A prestigious, Board-awarded Certification Recognizing The Company's Knowledge and Field Experience In Indoor Environmental Investigation and Consulting.

Pure Air Solutions Services is a now ANSI recognized ACAC member, holding the prestigious designation of Certified Indoor Environmentalist (CIE) designation. Pure Air Solutions Services is accredited by the Council of Engineering and Scientific Specialty Boards, offering occupational hygiene testing services to the northern regions of Alberta and Northwest Territories.

Never heard of our ACAC certification before?

Just some of the organizations and agencies that require, recommend, or recognize ACAC certifications include the following:

Are You Dealing With A Sewage Back up?

Some inside information into how and why we select the right method of evaluation for your project.

The bacterium Clostridium difficile (yellow), which frequently causes diarrhoea in people who have been on antibiotics, produces a compound that smothers the growth of other gut microbes.

 

Pure Air Solutions Services offers testing services to homeowners whose homes have been affected by sewage back-ups. An often traumatic experience with a significant amount on contamination to textiles, Pure Air Solutions Services understands the meaning of being able to offer a confirmed ‘clean’ result.

Listed below is some of the industry discussions surrounding various methods of cost effect analysis to offer home owners however the downfalls are also accounted for. Typically sampling for sewage contamination is costly and there’s good reason why. In order to obtain a true indication of any parasites, viruses or bacteria lurking on your contents, at Pure Air Solutions Servives we incubate the samples and culture them to find if they are truly clean.

A cost effect method known as Luminescence tests for ATP is one choice, as there many bacteria/mould luminesence testing devices making this method of analysis not only cost efficient but offer immediate results.

The downfall to ATP testing is that it has confounders- If one wants a clean non-organic surface, ATP testing would be useful but not specific. You are checking to see if the surface was cleaned for ATP containing material - hence why it works for food industry and health care, but I would not expect a virus to have or make ATP, thus, you are missing the testing of viruses and are presuming that the general cleanliness of ATP sources is a sufficient surrogate. In addition to this, luminescence type testing devices do not differentiate pathogen bacteria from non pathogens often skewing the results.

Regardless of the sampling method performed, for the most accurate representation of results one would need to compare pre and post remediation results. If for whatever reason pre-remediation samples are unavailable, since sewage must be cleaned up immediately, one must take extra care into ensuring a control area sample is then collected to compare to the area that was cleaned up.




Fort McMurray seeing big spike in water-treatment costs

David Thurton · CBC News · Posted: Feb 09, 2017 6:00 AM MT | Last Updated: February 9, 2017

The cost of providing clean drinking water to Fort McMurray has spiked after the 2016 wildfire and could rise even higher in 2017.

The city's water treatment plant is spending more on food-grade chemicals to remove burnt forest-floor ash that's flushing into the municipality's drinking water supply.

"We've had to increase chemical dosages," Travis Kendel, manager of water treatment for the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo, said Wednesday.

"We've had to incur additional overtime or additional operational oversight, to make sure the water we produce continues to meet all quality standards and continues to be safe."

In 2015, the municipality spent about $1 million on chemicals to purify Fort McMurray's water supply.

In 2016, the May wildfire pushed up chemical costs by an additional $500,000. And this year, the municipality may have to spend an extra $500,000 or $1 million on chemicals over what it spent in 2015, Kendel said.

The chemicals help purify chocolate-milk coloured Athabasca River water into clean, clear drinking water.

Travis Kendel says Fort McMurray's water treatment plant is using more food-grade chemicals to separate burnt forest-floor ash that’s flushing into the municipality’s drinking water supply. (David Thurton/ CBC)

The Fort McMurray wildfire is one of the costliest insured disasters in Canada's history, at approximately $3.6 billion. The fire that's still smoldering covered 589,552 hectares and devoured over 2,400 structures. 

From Day 1, scientists Monica Emelko of the University of Waterloo and Uldis Silins from the University of Alberta have worked with the province and the municipality to monitor the wildfire's impact on the Athabasca River.

Both researchers are co-principal investigators in the Southern Rockies Watershed Project, which monitors water quality from its source all the way to the tap.

One problem researchers are already seeing is more dissolved organic carbon from the Athabasca River intake. Carbon reacts with the chlorine and produces byproducts in the water that can be harmful to humans.

"Some of these byproducts are suspect carcinogens and some of them are carcinogens," Emelko said.

Researchers are bracing for the possible growth of algae in the plant's untreated water storage ponds. Increased phosphorous and carbon in the water from wildfire debris could create harmful blue-green blooms.

"Some algae produce toxins," Emelko said, "They include neurotoxins that affect your nervous system. They can be liver toxins."

Researchers Uldis Silins and Monica Emelko are co-principal investigators in the Southern Rockies Watershed Project, which monitors water quality from its source to the tap.

"So when it's there we have to shut down and that could be problematic," Emelko said.

Most water utilities in Canada and the United States can't adequately remove the toxins. In 2014 a large toxic algae bloom in Lake Erie meant more than 400,000 residents in Toledo, Ohio couldn't safely drink their tap water. 

Because of these risks, the Fort McMurray water treatment plant has spent more money adding food-grade chemicals to reduce the amount of carbon in the water.

Kendel also anticipates the two storage ponds will need to be dredged to counteract the growth of algae in the spring.

"We'll be cleaning out those reservoirs, removing any residual from the wildfire that may have impacted them," he said.

Researchers are unclear how long wildfire debris will persist in the river.

Costs could have been higher

The water treatment costs could be even higher, researchers said, if it wasn't for proactive work done by he research community and local and provincial governments to ensure the wildfire didn't compromise Fort McMurray's water plant and the drinking supply. 

The plant survived the fire. Planning and foresight guaranteed the city's water supply remained safe to drink and residents could return.

"It would have been so much more if the water hadn't continue to flow from this plant that we are still standing in," Emelko said. "It's something I don't want to think about."

In the days immediately following the wildfire and evacuation, the province asked Emelko and Silins to drop everything and focus on how to make Fort McMurray's water safe.

Emelko said a Mother's Day getaway with her two girls turned into a work holiday. She helped emergency wildfire operations gauge if Fort McMurray's water treatment plant could handle sudden changes to water quality caused by the wildfire.

Silins traded in summer field work for seven-day work weeks assessing water contaminants and mapping more than 250 wildfire-affected watersheds that flow into the river.

"The biggest concern was identifying the ones closer to the water treatment plant," he said.

What might have helped the most was that an upgrade for the plant had been commissioned before the wildfire. New treatment equipment and capacity allowed it to quickly filter out ash and debris the wildfire sent down river.

Lessons for the rest of Canada

How Fort McMurray faces the challenge of treating drinking water — and the spike in costs — is being watched by the rest of Canada, the researchers said.

Climate change, Silins said, has affected the frequency and behaviour of wildfires in Alberta and around the country.

"Shifting climates and changing wildfire behaviours is something that has the attention of resource managers worldwide," he said.

Their research and lessons learned from Fort McMurray will better inform management of watersheds and treatment plants in wildfire prone areas around the country.

"Utilities across Canada are collectively trying to get together to get support from the federal government to talk about what are the similarities and what are the differences and what can we learn from each other," Emelko said, "because these disturbances are exceptionally difficult and expensive to respond to."

Follow David Thurton, CBC's Fort McMurray correspondent, on FacebookTwitter or contact him via email.



Alberta Technical Bulletin ISSUE NO. 20B - Asbestos Management

Excerpt from http://www.infrastructure.alberta.ca/Content/docType486/Production/TB-020B.pdf

Excerpt from http://www.infrastructure.alberta.ca/Content/docType486/Production/TB-020B.pdf

 

In the early 1980’s, Alberta Infrastructure embarked on a program of asbestos management. In a number of cases, enclosure or encapsulation were utilized to provide the necessary control measures. These methods, while providing proper protection to the building occupants, allow the known asbestos containing materials (ACMs) to remain in the building.

The condition of these materials changes with time and may become potentially unhealthy or hazardous if the materials are disturbed during routine maintenance, equipment maintenance or replacement, building renovations, building demolition or similar activities. Some of the more common ACMs which may be present in buildings are in the following forms and places:

  1. Sprayed-on fireproofing to structural

    columns, beams, joists, etc.

  2. Decorative/acoustic ceiling textures, suspended

    ceiling tiles and asbestos board used for fire, heat and mechanical protection, siding and interior panels.

  3. Insulation on mechanical equipment such as hot water/steam lines, sheet metal air ducts, and steam and hot water vessels and boilers.

  4. Flooring materials such as vinyl asbestos tiles or as a backing or underlayment beneath sheet vinyl goods. Also found in some concrete floor levelling compounds.

  5. Roofing materials such as asphalt shingles or as a base sheet under the shingles or in built-up roofing.

A more detailed list of building materials known to contain asbestos follows this article.

As a general rule of thumb, when there is any concern or doubt about a material it should be considered as potentially harmful. A sample of any material in your building(s), which you suspect contains asbestos, should be analyzed by a laboratory to determine whether or not it contains asbestos prior to any disturbance. We feel that a policy of preventative caution is the only attitude to assume.

ACMs encountered in Alberta Infrastructure facilities must be dealt with in accordance with present legislation in a responsible manner. Practicality and common sense should take a leading role in determining required action and establishing a proactive management program.

A proactive management program must take into account that the human resources and physical conditions of a building are in constant change, and must contain “safeguards” to accommodate these variables.

Historically, Alberta Infrastructure has followed a policy of “opportunistic removal”, that is, if an ACM is in good condition it may be left in place, so long as it remains undisturbed and its condition is monitored on an ongoing basis.

If a renovation or demolition project is planned where ACMs are to be disturbed, the opportunity should be taken to remove them in a proper manner.

ACM removal is to be discussed with the Building Environment Unit.

The Building Environment Unit has been dedicated to provide asbestos management advice including, but not limited to, such services as:
1. Building surveys

2. Hazard assessments
3. Contract document preparation
4. Construction management
5. Asbestos management workshops
6. Asbestos awareness seminars
7. Assistance with asbestos management plans

The above services may be provided by Alberta Infrastructure and/or a private environmental consultant. Where provision of services by an outside consultant is selected as the route to follow, the Building Environment Unit is available to assist in setting the scope of work, terms of reference and to assist with contract and construction administration.

How to Prepare for Your Mould Inspection

Screen Shot 2019-10-15 at 11.05.29 PM.png

Leading up to your appointment, some pertinent information that will hopefully satisfy any questions or concerns regarding if this method of sampling is right for you – 

 

The minimum number of non-viable air samples we can take is 2, as each time fungal air quality testing is performed, each visit requires a control sample/ baseline from outdoors. That being said, unless previously discussed with you (the client), a general mould quote provided will always list 1 indoor and the associated outdoor control factor sample. If you wish to include more at the time of our visit that will be added to the quote as an upgrade to the scope. It is recommenced each area of concern have its own sample performed as these aid in creating a map of variability throughout the house as well as highlights any potential hidden areas resulting in higher amplification that may be previously unknown. 

 

The method we utilize for air quality sampling for microbiological contaminants is via the Air-O-Cell™ Air Sampling cassette is a sampling device designed for the rapid collection and analysis of a wide range of airborne aerosols. These include fungal spores, pollen, insect parts, skin cell fragments, fibers, and inorganic particulates. Air enters the cassette, the particles become impacted on the sampling substrate, and the air leaves through the exit orifice. The airflow and patented cassette housing is designed in such a way that the particles are distributed and deposited equally on a special glass slide contained in the cassette housing called the ``trace."

Please refer below for the benefits and disadvantages of performing air sampling versus direct examination.

 

AIR SAMPLING COLLECTION

BENEFITS 


Useful for initial site testing, especially if fungal growth is not visible. Quick and simple procedure. Fast turnaround times available. Low chance of sample contamination.

 

DISADVANTAGES 


Fungi cannot be fully speciated with this method. For example, Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp. are normally reported together due to the similarities in spore morphology. Spore viability cannot be assessed. Distinguishing between species is often request when there is attempts to identify health concerns and symptoms related to the individual mould types. 

 

If there is visible mould found, we can also perform tape lift and swab samples to identify the species type. Tape lift, bulk and swab sampling, are techniques used for direct examination. A direct exam allows for the immediate determination of the presence of fungal spores as well as what types of fungi are present. Direct examinations should only be used to sample visible mold growth in a contaminated area since most. Most surfaces collect a mixture of fungal spores that are normally present in the environment.

 

SWABS, TAPE LIFT, BULK SAMPLE COLLECTION

BENEFITS 


1. The direct exam is inexpensive and can be performed quickly. 
2. A useful test for initial site sampling. 
3. Direct examination of a surface indicates all mold present in a given area. 
4. Direct sampling may reveal indoor reservoirs of spores that have not yet become airborne. 

 

DISADVANTAGES 


1. Areas of fungal growth are often small and scattered, so they may not be picked upon sampling. 
2. Health problems related to indoor microbial growth are generally caused by the inhalation of substantial numbers of airborne spores, sometimes over a long period of time. The presence of biological materials on a particular surface, is not a direct indication of what may be in the air. 
3. Not all the spores seen under the microscope may be viable (alive). It is advisable to combine direct exam samples with culture methods to get a better picture of what molds are present. 
4. Tape lifts are not able to be cultured. 
5. If a direct examination of a swab sample is taken, there is no follow up culture. 
6. Direct examinations of dirt/soil and dust samples cannot be performed. 

 Additionally, a small questionnaire will be presented at the time of sampling to go over any past history of water damages and to gather information that may also contribute to the degradation of indoor air quality. 

The available science on molds and their potential health effects remains under study, but considerable progress has been made. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Institute of Medicine of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the World Health Organization and Health Canada all agree that living or working in a building with mold damage results in increased risk of respiratory disease. Although there are several guidance documents available, there are no accepted national or international standards for mold investigation, evaluation or remediation. Pure Air Solutions Services utilizes governing bodies of publish literature from the American Industrial Hygiene Association, Alberta Health Services and the World Health Organization to aid in determining when mould spore amplifications are found.